Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Be Readers Together


I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve read the books in the Harry Potter series. For years I listened to the audiobooks on my morning runs (before I discovered podcasts... eh hem, Harry Potter-themed podcasts). 


I’ve lost count of the number of children I’ve brought into the world of Harry Potter through the audiobooks, too. I’ve seen legions of them pass through my classroom doors, many wearing round glasses and a eyeliner-penciled lightning scar on their forehead on the way out.


Each reader brought a different response to the story, to the characters, to the voices actualized to perfection by Jim Dale. 


But one student’s response will stay with me. 


Always. ⚡



Susan had been working her way through the series via the audiobooks for the better half of a calendar year. She’d started midyear as a third grader in my multi-age homeroom class. By early spring of her fourth grade year, she was reaching the end of book 6. 


Spoiler alert: If you don’t yet know what happens atop the Astronomy Tower at the end of Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, stop NOW! Walk away. Read Harry Potter. Then come back. I’ll wait.


When I sat down at my conferencing table on the quiet, sunny Tuesday our story starts, there was nothing about the hum of readers around the room that would suggest that devastating and shocking things were about to happen within the pages of a beloved book. (See what I did there? Some of you will. If not, perhaps it’s time for a reread?)


Susan was sitting cross-legged on a dilapidated bean bag with the book in her lap about ten feet away. She didn’t have her headphones on that day, and Jim Dale’s voice could be heard just over my shoulder. I’d just finished up a conference with another student when I heard, “Severus… please…”


Many years and multiple readings since I first heard those words, and my stomach still drops on cue. 


I looked over my shoulder. Watching. Observing a moment of pure book love. 


I knew this moment. The shock. Disbelief. Despair. Feeling in that minute as lost, alone, and helpless as Harry himself. Susan wasn’t sitting on the classroom floor. She was atop the astronomy tower.  


This is what our greatest stories do, isn’t it? They bring us joy, excitement, and love alongside our characters. And they are absolutely devastating. 


I wanted to leap across the room, hit pause on the iPad, and knock the book from her hands. Instead, I walked over and sat down next to her. We listened side by side as Harry’s last and greatest protectors fell. Together a few tears escaped. 


We didn’t discuss the book that day. I didn't track her progress or discuss word choice. This wasn’t a “check for understanding” moment or even an instructional moment. 


This was a “being a reader” moment.


Teachers, we know this about stories. That’s why we spend our days sharing books with kids, giving them the tools to unlock the magic. 


We know the depth of emotions we’ve endured at the hands of our favorite stories. That’s why our bookshelves are stocked and our online shopping carts are always full. 


Our favorite teacher educators know this, too. Penny Kittle and Donalyn Miller. Colby Sharp and Kylene Beers. To become readers, kids need books. They need books that fit them. Inspire them, make them laugh, make them cry, make them want to turn the page again and again.


We know it because that’s how we became readers. 


What this story reminds me of, though, is how important it is to keep my reading life healthy and abundant. There is another level to the craft of building a reader, of building a relationship with a reader, and that is the moment of shared experience.


When you, too, can say, “I felt that way, too!”


So keep buying the books (local and independent, if you please). And keep reading them. Then hand them to the kids. 


Be readers together.





 

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

Find the Reader

    In the early fall of 2010, Aiden marched into my 2nd/3rd grade multi-age classroom looking more like a bulldozer than a second-grader. He was stocky and solemn with short, curly hair and light brown skin. His mouth set in a firm line, his hands shoved into his pockets. He surveyed the room warily, standing a few feet away from his mom, as the hustle and bustle of Open House visitors swarmed the room. 

It’s difficult for every student to make a first impression on a crazy night where we teachers are trying to look calm, cool, and collected as we meet new parents, answer logistical questions about buses and supply lists, hug last year’s alumni, and do our best to assuage the fears and anxieties the new students have as they anticipate a new year. 

Aiden did.

I remember how he stood stoically, independently, out of arm’s reach of his mother and sister. Some kids who had already entered the room were exploring the shelves, bouncing on yoga balls, or touching anything within reach. Others stood huddled close to their family member, quiet and wary but with a hint of interest. 

Aiden demonstrated neither the excitement and curiosity that would propel him into the room or the shy insecurity that would keep him close to his grown-up. 

He looked upon the room with determined indifference, except for the slight scowl that drew his eyebrows together and gave away a hint of the suspicion he already harbored for the place. 

I don’t think he spoke a word, to me or his mom, in the time he spent in my room that first evening, nor would he speak much in the upcoming two years we would share a classroom. 

But so much in that silence would change.

As a second-grader Aiden already carried an “Early Intervention Program” label with his name. His student information card from the previous year’s teacher documented poor reading and writing, exceptional handwriting, a tendency to bully, and a love for art. He had already been served through our school’s intervention program with computer-based phonics practice and made little growth. He had acquired very few of his sight words and phonics checkpoints and tested well below grade level on end-of-year screenings. 

I remember thinking, when Aiden sat down next to me to do our beginning of the year reading assessment, how awful this moment must be for him. 

How tough he wanted to look.

How anxious he was that he couldn’t fake me out sitting here next to me. Couldn’t do the reading “dance” from across the room, holding the book, turning the pages, staying quiet until the timer went off. Not drawing attention to himself. 

I listened to him struggle through part of a passage, made the necessary notes, and put the book aside. Afterward, I attempted to start a conversation with him, but it was mostly one-sided and I sent him back to his seat shortly after. 

I was worried about Aiden. 

I didn’t know how to reach him when he would immediately pull down the shutters every time he sat next to me. His pride seemed to be at the top of his list of priorities. He was embarrassed by his struggle to read. He knew what it meant when he had been pulled to work with an EIP teacher in previous years. He wasn’t fooled, and he hated it. And he was ready to beat the snot out of any kid who might point it out to him. 

Aiden was angry at school and I couldn’t blame him. 

Anyone who met Aiden could tell that he was bright. I had a feeling that his vocabulary and comprehension skills were well above his fluency and decoding, so I decided to try a new approach.

After a few weeks together, I called Aiden over to the conference table during silent reading. I handed him my iPhone, a pair of headphones, and the first Diary of a Wimpy Kid book. Copies of Diary of a Wimpy Kid had been circulating endlessly among our upper-elementary schoolers. 

The first few editions of Jeff Kinney’s remarkable series were out at this time and the books were well-loved. Kinney’s groundbreaking departure from a traditional prose format with comic-book-style sketches was appealing to leagues of older elementary readers, especially those overwhelmed by a high volume of text on a page. 

And of course, the books are hilarious, too. But the humor, particularly the sarcasm, takes a higher level of comprehension and even maturity to really understand. 

By this point in the year, Aiden’s classmates and I had seen much of Aiden’s artistic talent. While his art was much more realistic, choosing to sketch cars and athletes with incredible detail and accuracy, rather than Jeff Kinney’s comic style, I thought Aiden would appreciate and enjoy breaking up the flow of words with sketches. 

I told him that I’d just gotten the audiobook for Diary of a Wimpy Kid and thought he might want to check it out. 

Aiden took the items from my hands with little enthusiasm, and I showed him the app and got him started. A few minutes later, the sweetest sound broke the quiet of our silent reading time. 

A little chuckle.

Aiden was laughing! 

I’ll tell you now that reflecting on Aiden’s laugh chokes me up a little as I write this. It was a sound that we didn’t hear too often, but it was so genuine that it makes me happy all over again just to think about it.


Throughout the rest of the year, Aiden read every book in the Diary of a Wimpy Kid Series he could get his hands on. As each one came available, I’d purchase and download the audiobook. 

Eventually, Aiden learned to follow the words with the audio. This took time and practice, and sometimes, he would abandon the task of tracking the words and just sit back and listen. 

How much did Aiden’s reading levels improve that year? 

How many more sight words did he know by the end of second grade? 

What was his fluency rate? 

I don’t know. 

I’m not sure I would tell, even if I could. I know that’s what we teachers need to prove ourselves and you, my friend, have probably gotten to a place where you know my perspective on that. 

I know the school, the county, the state, the politicians who are judging the success of my students, my school, and me want a number. 

But that’s not what I remember. And, in my humble opinion, it’s not what matters.

That laugh. 

That’s what matters to me. Because here’s what it tells me:

  • Aiden was reading.

  • He was comprehending the story itself.

  • His sense of humor was sophisticated enough to understand the joke and its humor.

  • He was having a positive experience reading.

Aiden, that kid who had put up such a strong wall against school and all it represented to him that you could practically see it when he walked in the door, had a positive experience with reading. 

And that positive experience is what I needed to start breaking down his walls. Only then could we really start building a foundation for reading growth.

I’ll tell you that Aiden’s numbers did improve. I’ll tell you that I went to bat for him over and over again for the next two years. Arguing that he was, in fact, reading, when he listened to his audiobooks. That this should be considered an intervention (it wasn’t). Sticking headphones on him and handing him yet another copy of DOAWK was not all I did for Aiden. We met daily for sight word practice. We read every somewhat high-interest book I could find that was on his instructional level for decoding and phonics skills. 

He didn’t really like it. But he humored me. And he learned. 

And, do you know what else happened? He wrote! 

He started filling the margins of his stories with his drawings. His writing reflected his phonemic struggles, but he would use his word wall and his sight words. He started writing stories and asking to share them with me. 

Aiden moved after his third-grade year. It broke my heart to see him go. I was lucky to spend two years working with Aiden. 

Two years gave me the gift of time. I think that when we teachers are faced with the challenge of results within the window of the school year, we sometimes let fear get the better of us and start asking, “Why aren’t they making progress? What should we do? What interventions need to be used?” We sometimes do this before the student has had a chance to get his/her/their feet under them. 

I learned from Aiden. 

I learned from that moment when Aiden laughed aloud at a joke in The Diary of a Wimpy Kid. 

I learned that we can teach the skills and strategies of reading, but all of that needs a place to go. It needs to go to a reader. We must focus first on helping kids become readers, whatever that may take. 

Only then can we ask them to engage in the work; the phonics, the vocabulary, the comprehension that will help them grow.


Sunday, October 11, 2020

Rethinking In-Person School

After 5 weeks of digital learning, we are beginning preparations for bringing students back into the building for in-person school.


The feelings I have swirling around this decision can’t seem to settle on any one particular sentiment. Instead, I’m putting my energy towards taking my digital learning professional lessons with me back into the classroom.


Digital learning had its flaws and pitfalls, to be sure. And my district’s decision to return to in-person instruction before the projected 3-consecutive week decline in COVID cases that was initially planned is a reflection of this. The inequity of learning experiences was a gaping hole in the rickety rope bridge that was digital learning. Too many young friends could not leap across. 


Digital learning as a whole did not work for too many in our area. But that doesn’t mean that lessons from digital teaching can’t come with us back to the brick and mortar classrooms.


Here are the big ideas that I will be rethinking:


    • 🧩Free choice breaks

•⏲ Instructional minutes

 •😊 Behavior expectations



🧩Free Choice Breaks


When the schedule for digital learning first came out, my kindergarten team and I issued a collective gasp. The online instructional day will begin at 8:30 and end at 2:00 for all elementary school students. We were aghast. How could they possibly expect this of our 5- and 6-year-olds?


We went to work crafting a schedule with short work sessions, concise lesson segments, and strategically timed free-choice breaks. Based on our digital schedule, our students had a 15-minute free time within every hour. During this time students got out their favorite toys, chatted with their friends and me, went outside, laid down, or had a snack. 


Each student needed something different from the break: socializing, quiet time, space to move, food, etc.


Although we’d always taken breaks in the classroom, they did not have the range and choice that was available in digital learning. Most often what I called a “break” was a different type of structured expectation. We would do a silly dance video, sing a song, or play a group game. 


While I’d seen these activities as breaks from instruction, and certainly they were that for my students, they weren’t actually breaks from being instructed. Everyone did the same activity. Everyone was expected to return to work after 3-4 minutes. 


When we return to the building, I will offer more choice, more time, and less structure in our breaks. 



Instructional Time


To think about making breaks more effective and meaningful to students means to reflect on my use of instructional minutes. In the past, a break was squeezed in between instructional segments, allowing for no more than 5 minutes to transition from work to break and back again.


The speedy pace was a symptom of an overstuffed learning segment. Never enough time in the day to fit it all in. So we squeeze. 


But what about digital learning? 


In our digital learning classrooms, we were so aware of our students’ limits for screen time and attention span that we made decisions. We prioritized. We didn’t cram; we cut, combined, and condensed. 


Our curriculums are always going to offer more than can be done. And we are always going to want to do it all. And as each next-big-thing comes along, we add it to the list, shave a little away from somewhere else.


But how much time is lost in the shuffle of trying to do it all? How can I take the limitations of digital learning and, more specifically, our response to those limitations, and make our classroom-based instructional time more effective?


What lessons are the most valuable for most students? What lessons offer more range and application? What routines will help maximize instructional time so that less time is lost? How can differentiated instruction be offered in a manner that saves ineffective whole group lessons?


Back in the classroom, I will critically reflect on how I use instructional minutes so that my students’ needs are prioritized over “fitting it all in”.



😊Behavior Expectations


What happened to behavior issues during digital learning? Other than a few rouge microphone users at the beginning, behavior problems all but disappeared.


Sort of.


What would have constituted a disruption or redirection in the classroom, often went unnoticed, if not overlooked, in the digital classroom. Students were free to turn off their cameras or walk away from the computer for short segments when they became overwhelmed, bored, or distracted. 


Our understanding and anticipation of these issues led our Kindergarten teachers to forgive and ignore these little hiatuses. 


In a classroom setting, this option didn’t exist. Walking away from the group is viewed as disrespectful, distracting, and detrimental to one’s learning. And so it is not ignored but quickly addressed.


As I transition my thinking from the digital classroom expectations to the physical classroom expectations, I want to rethink the actual consequences of short disengagements and, more importantly, I want to rethink my response to them. 


The students who walked away for a moment during online instruction always came back, and usually, pretty quickly. Often they were more engaged when they returned, asked for clarification about what they missed, and participated in the classwork or lesson.


In the classroom setting, how can I facilitate routines and procedures for students to effectively self-regulate so that it enhances their overall learning experience, is viewed with understanding from the teaching team, and does not detract from other students’ attention?


I will make a strategic plan to support students’ self-regulation. I will rethink and reframe my response to students’ signals.




Ever since last Spring when it became clear that digital learning was going to be a semi-permanent situation, I started thinking about how it may offer the opportunity we in public education so desperately needed to step back and take one of those good, hard looks. 


From this side of digital learning, I don’t think we’ve seen the mindset shift I was hoping for on the grand scale -and maybe there is still time- but I can start with the (wo)man in the mirror. 


I can take these lessons, the wins and the losses, from digital learning and bring my students back into a classroom that has evolved.


Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Back to Normal?

Once again our social media feeds are filled with talk of school. 


Three months ago videos, memes, and posts, both funny and serious, praising teachers for their overlooked hard work occupied lots of newsfeed space as parents battled the challenges of remote learning. 


Now fears, questions, and arguments about returning to school are streaming in too quickly to keep up. Each newly suggested method for getting children into the school building becomes more convoluted than the next as another issue arises. 


How will classrooms be socially distanced? 

How will bus-riding children be kept apart? 

Where will they eat? 

How will we prevent contamination from Specials teachers who see every student in the building?

Where will sick kids go while they wait to be picked up?

...and many, many more.


And over all the tactics rings the voice from higher up: Kids need to be back in school. Kids need to be learning again*.


I’ve taught Kindergarten, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades in my 15 years of teaching. 

I want to make one thing very clear: the return to the school building -under social distancing guidelines- will not be a return to learning. 

Not learning as it was. 

Not learning that teachers work hard to craft.

Not learning as we (teachers, students, or parents) want it to be.


Our learning classrooms are places of singing and movement, side-by-side and group communication and collaboration, sharing and helping others, laughter and facial expressions, hugging and holding hands.


If your mental picture of a classroom resembles the school scene in A Christmas Story, returning to school in-person may seem feasible. It may seem downright easy. Stick ‘em in their chairs and deliver the lesson from the front of the room. Done.


Guys, that is precisely what made remote learning so hard for so many of us. That’s not how we teach. And we know it’s not how students learn.


I don’t have an answer about returning to in-person schooling. The problem is complex and multifaceted. And I worry equally about the safety of our children, teachers, and families whether students return to the building or continue to stay home. I worry about the health risks. I worry about the economic and personal challenges. 


But I do want to be sure we are making educated decisions. We need to be educated about the realities of the coronavirus and how to be safe.


We need to understand that a safety-regulated, socially-distant school experience is not “back to normal”. 





*Note: I reject the idea that kids stopped learning during remote instruction, but that would lead me down a whole other path. Maybe next week.


Tuesday, May 19, 2020

Ocean poem

As a teacher-learner, I want to grow as a writer in my own right. My Teach Write writing group set an "ocean poem" challenge inspired by the the book Write the Poem. Here is mine.

Ocean Edges

Scabbed, freckle-speckled knees
dangle
off Pop-Pop's dock as
blue-brown crabs scutter
inches below my toes
in the sandy shallows.

Sure, not far from here 
is a fathomless deep,
breaching whales,
a school of gray fish,
a shark on the hunt, even.

But, near here
is a just a ten-year-old me,
and a place where enormous things
become 
quiet and still.

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

The Right to Write

Tonight I sit at my computer attempting to write words about being a teacher. Ideas. Suggestions. Solutions. Strategies. And yet, I just came off of a day steeped in chaos, struggles, and mistakes.

In the first two hours of my day I asked myself what must have been 100 questions, second-guesses, and challenges. Here are just few:

  • Did I receipt these field trip forms?
  • He hit again. What should I say to help reset the morning?
  • This student has been absent for over a week. He looks so tired. How can I help him adjust this morning?
  • She's refusing to join in Morning Meeting greeting. What should I say to model compassion but set high expectations for how we treat each other?
  • Why does she do this?
  • How can I be proactive tomorrow? And how can I remember to remember to be proactive tomorrow? 
  • How can I better engage students during the writing mini-lesson? 
  • She's still forgetting spaces between her words. What should we try today?
  • She's refusing to join the group again. What should I do?
  • They are arguing about who is touching who. I'm trying to teach a phonics lesson. Should I stop? Ignore it?

How can I sit down at the end of a day like this and write? Write about my ideas, my suggestions, my solutions and strategies. Do I even have any? Some days, like today, my shelves seem rather bare.

Self doubt creeps in. Who am I to write about being a teacher?

A teacher. That's who.

I've been there. I am there. I'm going back there tomorrow.
I can share my mistakes. I can share what I learn from what goes wrong, and I can share when it goes a little better the next time. I can't share perfection. And I can't wait for perfection to share.

And I don't just give. I take. I take and take and take. I take from the other teachers making mistakes, asking questions, second guessing choices, and re-conceiving challenges. And I don't ask for perfection from them.

I've made a deal with myself that I will be forgiving. Forgiving of my own faults and flaws. I will put myself out there because I want to be in community with my fellow teachers. I love us so much. I love what we are doing. What we believe we can achieve, even if we all know we set our sights unrealistically high. 

Tonight I'll write even though it was a messy day. I'll write even though my mini-lesson didn't land. I'll write even though we had to put a lot of work into showing kindness. I'll write even though one student's challenges seemed too big for the love I could give in one day.
I'll write. And I'll come back tomorrow.

Because I don't have to be perfectly right to write.
 

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

When Nonreaders Read

What makes a reader? 


When does one cross over from nonreader to reader? Earn the badge of honor?


What if there was no such thing as a nonreader?


What if, and stay with me here, holding a book is all it takes to make one A READER. Upside-down.
Closed. Chewed on a little. One’s first interaction with a book is the moment she becomes a reader.


We know from research that learning through shared reading experiences starts when parents read to
their children. These experiences, even before children are speaking, are developing vocabulary,
building background knowledge, and crafting “book” knowledge, such as how a book is held, how to
turn the pages, etc. Most importantly, early shared reading experiences provide a child with a reading
role model and condition her to associate reading with pleasure. As Jim Trelease wrote in
Why Read Aloud to Children, “We read aloud to children for the same reasons we talk with them: to
reassure; entertain; bond; inform; arouse curiosity; and inspire.” 

Why then are we as teachers cautious about putting books in the hands of those deemed as
“non-readers”? When the truth of the matter is that building positive experiences with books is crucial
to the development of all readers. "If a child seldom experiences the “pleasures” of reading and increasingly meets its “unpleasures,” the natural reaction will be withdrawal" (Trelease,
Why Read Aloud to Children).


Everyday our whole Kindergarten class spends 15 minutes on Read by Myself. This is in addition to
the time spent on Read by Myself during workshop. This is a shared, all-in, everyone-reads time with
a collection of self-selected books. 


No levels. 


No assigned books.


No computer interventions.


And if you walked around my kindergarten classroom during Read to Myself and just watched,
you’d be at a loss as to who’s in the Level A or Level H Guided Reading group. All you’d see is
readers. Readers sitting in plastic mini-rockers. Readers sprawled out on their bellies. Readers
curled up in a giant papasan. Books are open. Pages are being turned. Some whispered voices
and not-so-whispered voices punctuate the quiet as children point out interesting pictures, trade
books, or call out about an exciting part. You would notice some students tracing text with their fingers
and others carefully observing the pictures. You’ll notice some not-so carefully observing the pictures,
too. 


And they are all readers.

Everyone one of these children is experiencing a book as a reader. I think it’s important that we teachers don’t let our definition of reader and, by proxy, nonreader label our students and their reading practices. Allowing every student time to read, whatever that looks like, is key to developing into full-fledged read-the-words reader by building positive experiences with books for every student.

Know Yourself, Know Your Students: How to use personality frameworks to humanize your classroom (part 4)

Using the personality frameworks in your classroom Over the past two months, I’ve been writing and thinking a lot about the work I did to us...